View Single Post
Re: Fender Guitars lose guitar copyright case
Old
  (#7)
R.B. Huckleberry is Offline
n00b!
R.B. Huckleberry is on a distinguished road
 
R.B. Huckleberry's Avatar
 
Posts: 33
Join Date: Oct 2008
   
Default Re: Fender Guitars lose guitar copyright case - 04-13-2009, 06:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSandMan
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.B. Huckleberry
It's rumored that Fender wants to become a publicly traded company. This would have gone a long way towards making their shares big sellers. Now they have to deal with the bad press/karma that this lawsuit has created, as well as the enormous debt they racked up buying Kaman (Hamer/Ovation).

I love Fender guitars. Really, I do. But they had this loss coming to them. And not defending the designs for FIFTY YEARS was just the beginning of it.
+1

I like Fender and all their accomplishments, but I don't understand how they think they can copyright a body (unless its a copied exact to spec -- which I think is wrong). But to have a similar body style would be like Ford copyrighting a Sedan and Coupe body car-styles.
Even then, don't turm a blind eye for 50 years then go on the attack. It's very obvious it was to make money, and cut out a growing portion of the market. Noone would buy a Suhr Classic (Strat model) if it couldn't touch the Fender equivalent. However: Suhr & other manufacturers could make a Strat much better, and word got out. Fender needed to counter with products worthy of the advertisment "If you want a Strat, you won't find one better than a Fender". However, they didn't. So they just look lik ethey're saying "Hey! They're making a great product! We need to crush them!"
  
Reply With Quote